<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>William F. Aicher &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.williamaicher.com/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.williamaicher.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:24:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hesitancy on the New Web 2.0 IPOs</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/06/20/hesitancy-on-the-new-web-2-0-ipos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/06/20/hesitancy-on-the-new-web-2-0-ipos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 21:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a reality check: Groupon lost $456.3 million in 2010. It lost $146.5 million in Q1 2011. Sounds like a winner, huh? &#8230; Groupon has all the classic hallmarks of the 90&#8242;s era dot-com failure. Big new idea: check. Media hype: check. &#8220;Too good to be true&#8221; come-on to consumers: check. Endless need to expand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Here&#8217;s a reality check: Groupon lost $456.3 million in 2010. It lost $146.5 million in Q1 2011. Sounds like a winner, huh?</em></p>
<p><em>&#8230;</em></p>
<p><em>Groupon has all the classic hallmarks of the 90&#8242;s era dot-com failure. Big new idea: check. Media hype: check. &#8220;Too good to be true&#8221; come-on to consumers: check. Endless need to expand into new markets/acquire new customers or perish: check. One-trick pony: check.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Read the full article here.<a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/2079974/hot-doesnt-equal-profitable?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed:ClickZExperts(ClickZ-Columns)&amp;utm_content=Netvibes">&#8216;Hot&#8217; Doesn&#8217;t Equal &#8216;Profitable&#8217; | ClickZ</a>.</p>
<p>And for some really good meaty bits, be sure to read the &#8220;new lessons to learn if we want to avoid the mistakes of the past&#8221; at the end of the article. I&#8217;m shocked at how many people never learned these lessons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/06/20/hesitancy-on-the-new-web-2-0-ipos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s Mid-Stream Policy Changes Kill a Successful Business</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/05/12/apples-mid-stream-policy-changes-kill-a-successful-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/05/12/apples-mid-stream-policy-changes-kill-a-successful-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 22:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So iFlow Reader is being forced to end their app due to Apple&#8217;s policies requiring in-App purchases. Two key quotes from them that are definitely worth reading: All you have to do is put the book in In-App Purchase. Sounds so reasonable, doesn&#8217;t it? But do you know how you do that? You go onto [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So iFlow Reader is being forced to end their app due to Apple&#8217;s policies requiring in-App purchases. Two key quotes from them that are definitely worth reading:</p>
<p><em>All you have to do is put the book in In-App Purchase. Sounds so  reasonable, doesn&#8217;t it? But do you know how you do that? You go onto  iTunes Connect, OK? And then you press some buttons and you get to a  page that lets you create a new In-App Purchase item. You sit there and  type in all the information, this description of the product and whatnot  so Apple can presumably use that description to decide whether to  approve it or not. There is no way to bulk load this. You can&#8217;t just  copy your database in there. You have to do this all manually. We have  access to 250,000 titles, not counting public-domain titles. We&#8217;re  supposed to enter them all in manually? </em></p>
<p><em>&#8230;</em></p>
<p><em>What people don&#8217;t understand is that if you&#8217;re selling an app on iOS,  Apple hosts that app on their server. You upload it, the customer  downloads it, it gets downloaded from their servers. OK. With In-App  Purchase it doesn&#8217;t work that way. You host everything. You ship it  directly to the customer. All Apple does in the process is collect the  money and basically give you a token that says it was collected and you  do everything else. It&#8217;s essentially doing exactly the same thing as a  credit-card processing company for this 30 percent. Nothing more.</em></p>
<div>Read more: <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-18438_7-20062030-82.html#ixzz1MBAe7usE">http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-18438_7-20062030-82.html#ixzz1MBAe7usE</a></div>
<div></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/05/12/apples-mid-stream-policy-changes-kill-a-successful-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Turns Out You CAN Use Exchange on a Xoom</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/27/it-turns-out-you-can-use-exchange-on-a-xoom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/27/it-turns-out-you-can-use-exchange-on-a-xoom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 21:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, for the last week I&#8217;ve been using Outlook Web Access to check work email on my new Xoom. Couldn&#8217;t figure out anything inside of the GMail app that was on my home screen about how to add an exchange server.  It turns out there&#8217;s a separate e-mail app for that and I just had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for the last week I&#8217;ve been using Outlook Web Access to check work email on my new Xoom. Couldn&#8217;t figure out anything inside of the GMail app that was on my home screen about how to add an exchange server.  It turns out there&#8217;s a separate e-mail app for that and I just had to set it up in the settings.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how to get there. Follow the link at the end to visit Motorola&#8217;s site for full instructions.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><em>Add an email account</em></strong></p>
<p><em> 1. From the home screen, touch Apps<br />
2. Touch Settings<br />
3. Touch Accounts &amp; Sync<br />
4. Touch + Add account (upper right hand corner)<br />
5. Touch Corporate</em></p></blockquote>
<p><em>v</em>ia <a href="https://motorola-global-portal.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/60695/~/motorola-xoom---set-up-corporate/exchange-e-mail">Motorola XOOM &#8211; Set up Corporate/Exchange E-mail</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/27/it-turns-out-you-can-use-exchange-on-a-xoom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spy Photo: Musicnotes on Android</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/21/spy-report-musicnotes-on-android/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/21/spy-report-musicnotes-on-android/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[musicnotes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a super-secret photo of the upcoming Musicnotes.com Android app. Development is coming along very nicely so far. Still a few months out, but with the technology that this is being programmed in (and due to less restrictions than Apple has), this is going to be a very cool app. Dare I say, cooler than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a super-secret photo of the <a href="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5305/5640701501_d5ef05a135_z.jpg"><img class="alignleft" title="Musicnotes on Android" src="http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5305/5640701501_d5ef05a135_z.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="384" /></a>upcoming Musicnotes.com Android app. Development is coming along very nicely so far. Still a few months out, but with the technology that this is being programmed in (and due to less restrictions than Apple has), this is going to be a very cool app. Dare I say, cooler than our iPad app.</p>
<p>In related news, I picked up a Xoom tablet for myself over the weekend. Needs more apps, but actually am really digging it. Since the wife has the iPad with her and she&#8217;s on vacation, I&#8217;m forced to use my new Xoom and after a few days I&#8217;ve really gotten attached to it.  But like I said, people seriously need to start developing more apps for Android.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/21/spy-report-musicnotes-on-android/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grooveshark Pulled from Android Marketplace</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/06/grooveshark-pulled-from-android-marketplace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/06/grooveshark-pulled-from-android-marketplace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grooveshark is gone from the Android Market. The popular music streaming service was removed from the Market yesterday because it violates Google’s terms of service. The exact terms were not revealed, but CNET notes that Grooveshark’s ongoing dispute with record companies over music streaming – and Google lawyer Kent Walker testifying before the U.S. House [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Grooveshark is gone from the Android Market. The popular music streaming service was removed from the Market yesterday because it violates Google’s terms of service. The exact terms were not revealed, but CNET notes that Grooveshark’s ongoing dispute with record companies over music streaming – and Google lawyer Kent Walker testifying before the U.S. House Judiciary committee on copyright violations – may have had something to do with Grooveshark’s removal.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://androinica.com/2011/04/grooveshark-android-app-removed-from-android-market/">Androinica » Grooveshark gets ganked from Google Android Market. Should Amazon Cloud be nervous?</a>.</p>
<p>So here&#8217;s my question: Does this even matter? Since the Android Marketplace is not the only place you can get apps for an Android device, this may make little or no difference in the long term. In fact, from my experience so far, the Amazon App Store is a superior experience to the Google Android Marketplace.  Obviously Amazon can sell / give away their cloud player app through their own marketplace, right?</p>
<p>Either way, what happens to Grooveshark is of little bother to me. They&#8217;ve been notorious for breaking copyright &#8211; as I explained in my book, <a href="http://www.starvingtheartist.com">Starving the Artist</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/06/grooveshark-pulled-from-android-marketplace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music Industry to Force Licenses for Amazon&#8217;s Cloud Music?</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/03/music-industry-to-force-licenses-for-amazons-cloud-music/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/03/music-industry-to-force-licenses-for-amazons-cloud-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 22:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As anyone who knows me can attest, I am a huge proponent of intellectual property rights. This, however, gives me some pause. It appears that the major music labels are upset with Amazon for not securing licenses for their cloud music player system. I honestly don&#8217;t really understand what the issue is here &#8211; it&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As anyone who knows me can attest, I am a huge proponent of intellectual property rights. This, however, gives me some pause.</p>
<p>It appears that the major music labels are upset with Amazon for not securing licenses for their cloud music player system. I honestly don&#8217;t really understand what the issue is here &#8211; it&#8217;s really no different from having a portable hard drive you take with you everywhere you go, is it?</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Amazon argues that Cloud Drive and Cloud Player are just services that let users upload and play back their own music, just like “any number of existing media management applications.” After all, licenses shouldn’t be necessary for users to play their own music, right? The labels seem to disagree — they expressed shock following Amazon’s announcement, with a Sony Music representative implying that the company was looking into legal options.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href='http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2011/04/music-industry-cloud-player/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed:wiredbusinessblog(Blog-Epicenter(Business))'>Music Industry Will Force Licenses on Amazon Cloud Player — or Else | Epicenter | Wired.com</a>.</p>
<p>And by the way, if you&#8217;re looking for a cheaper solution that so far isn&#8217;t under any scrutiny I&#8217;m aware of, check out <a href="https://winamp.orb.com/orb/html/login.html">Winamp Orb</a>. Basically it allows you to make your music collection on your home computer available for you to access anywhere. I&#8217;m assuming it is a bit more complicated for casual users than Amazon&#8217;s cloud is though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/04/03/music-industry-to-force-licenses-for-amazons-cloud-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Starz is Joining the Netflix Devaluation through Delay Party</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/25/starz-is-joining-the-netflix-devaluation-delay-party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/25/starz-is-joining-the-netflix-devaluation-delay-party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 13:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday news came out that Showtime is pulling Californication and Dexter from Netflix later this year. Now Starz is joining the party of negative news for Netflix fans. The channel has been one of Netflix’s closest partners, but it backed off a bit from that partnership on Thursday, when it announced a three-month delay between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday news came out that <a href="http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/24/netflix-is-losing-californication-and-dexter/">Showtime is pulling Californication and Dexter from Netflix</a> later this year. Now Starz is joining the party of negative news for Netflix fans.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The channel has been one of Netflix’s closest partners, but it backed off a bit from that partnership on Thursday, when it announced a three-month delay between the time Starz plays new TV episodes and when those episodes will be available on Netflix. Starz also said that it would impose a similar delay for movies sometime in the future, though Netflix said any such delay of movies would violate the contract between the two companies.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href='http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/business/media/25starz.html?partner=yahoofinance'>Starz to Delay Release of Shows on Netflix &#8211; NYTimes.com</a>.</p>
<p>So, not only has Netflix been hit with several 28-day window delays from major studios on new releases on DVD and Blu-Ray over the last year, but now they&#8217;re losing some of their most popular content left and right, <em>and</em> getting even more of it delayed even from streaming.</p>
<p>Bad news for Netflix, but even worse news for the consumer probably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/25/starz-is-joining-the-netflix-devaluation-delay-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Netflix is Losing Californication and Dexter</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/24/netflix-is-losing-californication-and-dexter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/24/netflix-is-losing-californication-and-dexter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netflix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well this definitely can&#8217;t be good news for Netflix. Even though they&#8217;ve just signed a new deal with Showtime, they&#8217;re losing two of the biggest shows. Definitely makes it even more clear that we won&#8217;t be seeing good options for watching premium content from channels like HBO, Showtime or even AMC anytime soon. Kind of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this definitely can&#8217;t be good news for Netflix. Even though they&#8217;ve just signed a new deal with Showtime, they&#8217;re losing two of the biggest shows. Definitely makes it even more clear that we won&#8217;t be seeing good options for watching premium content from channels like HBO, Showtime or even AMC anytime soon.</p>
<p>Kind of a bummer, since those are the only reasons I can think of to keep any sort of cable subscription. In fact, the only two reasons I haven&#8217;t canceled my Dish service completely (in favor of Netflix &#038; Hulu Plus) is so that it&#8217;s easy for me to have HBO turned on when True Blood starts up again, and Showtime when Dexter returns.  Otherwise, I&#8217;d love to cut the cable completely.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>While the new deal between the two companies will include streaming rights to shows like &#8216;The Tudors&#8217; and &#8216;Sleeper Cell,&#8217; two of Showtime&#8217;s biggest shows are being pulled. Both &#8216;Dexter&#8217; and &#8216;Californication&#8217; are being removed from the service.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href='http://www.highdefdigest.com/news/show/Dexter/Showtime/Netflix/Netflix_is_Losing_Californication_and_Dexter_in_New_Deal_with_Showtime/6582'>Netflix is Losing Californication and Dexter in New Deal with Showtime | High-Def Digest</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/24/netflix-is-losing-californication-and-dexter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung Just Killed My Xoom Lust</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/23/samsung-just-killed-my-xoom-lust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/23/samsung-just-killed-my-xoom-lust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, well&#8230; it looks like waiting for a bit and not buying Motorola&#8217;s Xoom was good for a few reasons (now including that they&#8217;re stopping production on them). A month ago I swapped out my Palm Pre for the HTC Evo 4G and so far have been surprisingly pleased with Android. I&#8217;ve had an iPad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well&#8230; it looks like waiting for a bit and not buying Motorola&#8217;s Xoom was good for a few reasons (now including that they&#8217;re <a href="http://www.gottabemobile.com/2011/03/23/report-motorola-to-cease-xoom-production-after-june/">stopping production on them</a>).  </p>
<p>A month ago I swapped out my Palm Pre for the HTC Evo 4G and so far have been surprisingly pleased with Android. I&#8217;ve had an iPad since launch, but even though it&#8217;s a very nice device, I still can&#8217;t get over the walled garden of Apple. It&#8217;s part of why I&#8217;ve never been an Apple fan, I guess (I used to love customizing the components on my PCs &#8211; something Macs never let you do).</p>
<p>So, all of this, along with the fact that I&#8217;ve <em>loved</em> every Samsung device I&#8217;ve had (TVs, Blu-Ray and even my old Instinct phone) gets me very excited to see that they&#8217;re finally learning from the mistakes they made with the first Galaxy tab (in particular, price and size) and are coming out with some very tasty looking updates.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The numbers are all there for the specmeisters, with this reworked Galaxy Tab rocking a slightly larger touchscreen over the iPad 2, higher resolution, a 1GHz dual core processor and lighter 595g weight compared to the 601g of the iPad 2 Wi-Fi. But the most important number of all is its price. Unlike Samsung’s overpriced predecessor, the 16GB Wi-Fi Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 will cost exactly the same as the iPad 2 Wi-Fi 16GB: $499. Bam!</em></p></blockquote>
<p>via <a href='http://mashable.com/2011/03/22/galaxy-tabs/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed:Mashable(Mashable)&#038;utm_content=Netvibes'>New Tablet: Is the Revised Galaxy Tab 10.1 an iPad 2 Killer? [GALLERY]</a>.</p>
<p>Looks like a Galaxy 10.1 is in my future. Now I just need June to get here (unless Samsung wants to send me one early &#8230; wink, wink).</p>
<p>Oh yeah&#8230; I forgot to mention that I picked up a Xoom a few weeks back for the office so we had a good-sized Honeycomb Android tablet to use for app development. I really dug it and the new WiFi only version was at the top of my &#8220;to-purchase&#8221; list. Samsung squashed that idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2011/03/23/samsung-just-killed-my-xoom-lust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon.com Is Down</title>
		<link>http://www.williamaicher.com/2010/06/29/amazon-com-down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.williamaicher.com/2010/06/29/amazon-com-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 20:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William Aicher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.williamaicher.com/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that the web site for Amazon.com is down. Reports have been coming in through Twitter and elsewhere. From what I&#8217;m seeing, it is very likely a database issue, as the site loads but no products seem to be working. Seeing as how both links for Starving the Artist here go to Amazon, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that the web site for Amazon.com is down. Reports have been coming in through Twitter and elsewhere. From what I&#8217;m seeing, it is very likely a database issue, as the site loads but no products seem to be working.</p>
<p>Seeing as how both links for <a href="http://www.starvingtheartist.com"><em>Starving the Artist</em></a> here go to Amazon, and Amazon.com is down, I should point out you can also buy it at <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/Starving-the-Artist/William-F-Aicher/e/9781452818931/">Barnes and Noble</a> (plus it&#8217;s on sale there!).</p>
<p>I wonder how much money Amazon&#8217;s losing.  I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s a lot.</p>
<p>BTW, If you&#8217;re ever looking for a good way to see if a site is down for just you or for everyone, use <a href="http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com">http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.williamaicher.com/2010/06/29/amazon-com-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

